Salt Lake City Business Litigation Attorney
Larsen & Rico is a Salt Lake City business litigation boutique firm. We are a team of trial lawyers who represent numerous local, national and international concerns in trials, appeals, arbitrations, mediations and strategic settlement negotiations. Our practice includes a full range of complex business disputes involving contracts, intellectual property, false advertising, trade secrets, trade dress, and shareholder and member disputes, including dissolution, direct and derivative actions, breach of fiduciary duty claims, fraud, real estate and construction disputes, products liability and personal injury claims, professional malpractice, and other business torts. Our cases frequently involve multifaceted accounting, engineering or technological issues. Our Salt Lake City business litigation attorneys have argued and tried cases before judges and juries in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, California, Texas, Florida, Colorado, Wyoming, Minnesota and New York. Using cutting-edge technology to simplify difficult concepts for a jury or to streamline witness examinations at trial, we view technology as another opportunity to persuade and to present the clearest view of the facts and law in each case.
We are lawyers’ lawyers—the lawyers other attorneys turn to for help with difficult or damaged cases; the lawyers other lawyers hire to represent them in personal business disputes. We represent clients ranging from national and international automobile and truck manufacturers, to high-end audio manufacturers, to national and local businesses, and to wealthy individuals and angel investors.
Experienced and Accomplished Salt Lake City Business Litigators
Representing both plaintiffs and defendants, our successes speak for themselves (click on the underlined case name for the opinion) while other high-dollar cases were settled with confidentiality provisions:
- Kingswick Holdings, LLC v. RS Kingsland, LLC: This was a real estate dispute over the authority of the CEO of SilverLeaf Financial, Kingswick’s manger, to sign a Loan Sale and Assignment Agreement dated December 20, 2011 (the “Assignment Agreement”), listing Kingsland as Assignee and Kingswick as Assignor. According to the terms of the Assignment Agreement, RS Kingsland is the assignee of a $5.2 million Promissory Note Kingsland Investments, L.P., executed in favor of Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, as well as a Deed of Trust and Security Agreement to secure the Promissory Note. The Trust Deed was recorded against a warehouse in St. Louis. The Court initially determined that the CEO did not have actual authority. At the conclusion of a four-day bench trial, however, the Court concluded in a 15-page opinion dated April 11, 2016, that the CEO had apparent authority to execute the Assignment Agreement. The case settled ten day later. (Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, Civil No. 140900578)
- Young Electric Sign Co. v. PC Dixon, LLC: On October 28, 2015, in a landslide opinion in favor or YESCO, the Court of Appeal of the State of California, Third Appellate District, reversed a $4 million jury verdict entered against YESCO. C072212.
- Giles Construction, LLC v. Tooele Inventory Solution, Inc.: On June 16, 2015, on a Motion for Summary Judgment, Judge Shelby of the United States District Court for the District of Utah dismissed all claims against our client, Tooele Inventory Solution, including claims for violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the Lanham Act and the Utah Uniform Trade Secret Act. Case No. 2:12-cv-37.
- United Producers v. Brokerage 360: On June 10, 2015, at 9:00 p.m., in a complicated Utah Uniform Trade Secret Act case, with over 600 marked exhibits, the jury returned a verdict for the Defendant Brokerage 360 and its owner, Defendant Carl Roestenburg. United Producers asked the jury for $1.2 million for unjust enrichment and received nothing, zero against these key defendants. (Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, Civil No. 120905831)
- Arrowhead Dental, Inc. v. Soren McAdam Christenson, LLP, et al.: Arrowhead Dental Laboratories recovered $1.2 million in embezzlement/auditor malpractice lawsuit. (Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, Civil No. 100901078 MI)
- RS-ANB Fund, LP v. KMS SPE LLC, et al.: After winning a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, RS-ANB Fund, LP recovers more than $3 million in breach of contract litigation. (U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho)
- Bel Canto Design, Ltd. v. MSS HiFi, Inc.: Bel Canto obtains injunction for Lanham Act violations, defeats antitrust claims and obtains $158,963 award of fees and costs. (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York)
- Tooele Associates, Ltd. v. Tooele City: In a jury trial in the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, the Jury awarded the developer a $20.1 million verdict against Tooele City in construction and land use matter. (The City eventually settled this case, agreeing to pay the entire judgment.)
Sophisticated Salt Lake City Business Litigation Strategy for Success
These cases and others are the reason all of Larsen & Rico’s partners have been repeatedly named among Super Lawyers and Utah’s Legal Elite, and are AV® rated by Martindale-Hubbell.® With aggressive and strategic representation of our clients’ needs — and the experience and dedication to back it up — we are master tacticians on your side in the courtroom, whether it’s a trial, an appeal or any other bloodsport. Contact our Salt Lake City business litigation attorneys today.